This Data Brief (PDF version available here) presents an analysis of excess mortality (increase in deaths) for California in 2020 and 2021, using California vital statistics death data (death certificates), and includes assessment of differential increases by race/ethnic group, age, and increases in deaths due to conditions other than COVID-19. This analysis is a follow-up to findings in the State Health Assessment Core Module 2021 Update, part of the State Health Assessment.

Summary



Findings

Deaths increased in 2020 and 2021 compared to prior years

  • There were 316,962 deaths in California in 2020 (corresponding to an age-adjusted all-cause death rate of 675.4 per 100,000 population), compared to 267,034 deaths in 2019 (rate of 583.1). This is a 15.8% increase in the death rate in California, and was the highest statewide death rate in the past 12 years.

  • In 2021 there were 329,312 deaths in California (corresponding to an age-adjusted all-cause death rate of 685.2 per 100,000 population), an additional increase of 1.5% from 2020.

Table 1 - Number, Age-Adjusted Rate, and Increase in Rate from Prior Year, Deaths from All Causes in California, 2017-2021



  • As the pandemic intensified throughout 2020, the increases in the rates accelerated. Comparing the 1st quarter of 2020 to the 1st quarter of 2019, death rates were similar, with just a 0.4% increase; then, in the 2nd quarter there was a 10.2% increase; a 23.1% increase in the 3rd quarter; and a 30.8% increase in the 4th quarter.

  • The rate in the 1st quarter of 2021 was a 37.5% increase from the 1st quarter of 2019, and was higher than all quarterly rates in 2020, and much higher than any other recent prior quarter.

Figure 1 - All-Cause Death Rate by Quarter and Year, California 2017-2021

Multi-line trend chart with one line for each year, 2017 to 2021; trend in all-cause age-adjusted death rate in California by quarter. This chart highlights the important seasonal pattern in deaths, and the increase in deaths in 2020 compared to the prior 3 years.

Download Figure 1 Data



Deaths increased more among some race/ethnicity groups than others

  • From 2019 to 2020, the death rate increased 34.3% among Latinos, 7.6% among Whites, and about 20% among other groups.

  • From 2019 to 2021, the death rate increased 38.3% among Latinos, 38.0% among American Indian/Alaska Natives, and 31.6% among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders; the increase was again, much lower among Whites (8.2%), and about 20% among Asians and Blacks.

Figure 2 - Percentage Increase in Race-Specific Age-Adjusted Death Rates 2019 to 2020/2021

Bar chart; bars show percent increase in age-adjusted death rate for each race/ethnicity in California. This chart highlights disparities in the increases in deaths in 2020.

Download Figure 2 Data



  • Deaths among all race/ethnic groups were higher in quarters 2, 3, and 4 of 2020 and in quarters 1, 3 and 4 of 2021 compared to the average rate of the corresponding 2017-2019 quarters.

  • From quarter 2 2020 to quarter 1 2021, these differences within each race/ethnic group increased for all race/ethnic groups, and disparities in rates between groups increased.

  • These disparities are seen in Figure 3a by observing the increasing gap within any specific race/ethnicity group (dotted line compared to solid line), and by observing the increasingly larger gaps in some groups than others.

  • These increases were all statistically significant for all groups in 2020. (See Appendix Figure Set 1)

Figure 3b - Percentage Increase in Age-Adjusted Death Rate by Quarter, 2020/2021 and 2017-2019 Average, by Race/Ethnicity

Grouped bar chart; groups are quarter 1 to 4 for each race/ethnic group, showing percentage increase in age-adjusted death rate from average rate of 2017 to 2019 to 2020 and 2021; This chart highlights differences in deaths rates within and between race/ethnic groups as 2020 progressed.

Download Figure 3b Data



Causes of death other than COVID-19 also increased

  • Aside from COVID-19, four conditions had large percent increases in deaths from 2019 to 2020, and 2019 to 2021: Drug overdoses (49.8%) in 2020 and (64.3%) in 2021, homicide (33.9% and 35.5%), diabetes (17.7% and 12.9%), and alcohol-related deaths (16.7% and 34.7%), Table 2.

  • Compared to 2019, the absolute number of deaths increased by over 1,000 for each condition in both 2020 and 2021 for Alzheimer disease, drug overdoses, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease and diabetes. The largest single increase was for drug overdoses, an increase of 3,763 deaths in 2021.

  • For drug overdose deaths, the increases are consistent with recent trends, albeit accelerated.

  • For Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, the increases are consistent with long-term increasing trends, but a sharp reversal of decreasing trends the past two years. For ischemic heart disease, the leading cause of death in California, the apparent increase in 2020 was a concerning reversal of a steady downward trend of many prior years. The increase in homicide is also striking and alarming, in contrast to the encouraging decreases the last few years, and the long-term downward trend. For long-term trends in cause-specific deaths in California, see Appendix Figure Set 2 or the California Community Burden of Disease Engine (CCB).

  • Regarding decreases from 2019 to 2020 and 2021, suicide/self-harm and lung cancers both had noteworthy decreases in both years.

Table 2 - 2017 to 2021, Selected Causes of Death, ordered by percent increase 2019 to 2020 [note: table is sortable]



  • Figure 4 below shows the trend from 2010 to 2021 of annual death rates for the causes with large increases noted above, and other selected leading causes of death.

  • COVID-19 was the second leading cause of death in 2020 and the leading cause of death in 2021.

  • Deaths from drug overdoses increased sharply in 2020 and 2021, continuing an increasing pattern; deaths from alcohol-related conditions also increased sharply in 2020 and 2021.

  • Deaths from ischemic heart disease and Alzheimer’s disease, the two leading causes of death in all years from 2000 to 2019, both increased in 2020 and decreased in 2021, a pattern that warrants further investigation.

  • Road injuries, after decreasing slightly in the prior three years, increased more sharply in 2020 and again in 2021.


The amount of increase in deaths, and conditions associated with the increase, differed substantially by age and race/ethnicity

  • In general, a large proportion of the increase in deaths among older persons was due to COVID-19 while a large proportion of the increase in deaths among younger persons was due to other conditions.

  • As seen in Figure 5, from 2019 to 2020 large (greater than 50%) increases in the number of deaths were seen among older (65-74) Latinos, younger (5-14 and 15-24) Blacks, and adult (35-44) AI/AN groups (detailed data in Appendix Figure Set 3 and Appendix Table 2).

  • From 2019 to 2021, large (greater than 50%) percent increases were generally seen in these same groups and among several Latino, Black, AI/AN, and NH/PI adult age groups.

  • The increase in deaths among young persons, particularly the 63.9% (in 2020) and 72.2% (in 2021) increase among 5-14 year-old Blacks, and the 50.5% (in 2020) and 46.0% (in 2021) increase among 15-24 year-old Blacks is highly concerning. While the underlying absolute numbers are small, the increases are nevertheless concerning on their own, and for their implications of differential health status, social pressures and access to care during the pandemic crisis. Additional investigation of these data will continue, and updates will be provided as they become available.

  • Among 15-24 year old Blacks and Latinos, the greatest contributing causes of death were homicide, road injury, and drug overdose.

    • Among Black 15-24, there were 916 deaths in 2020 and 2021 (465 in 2020 and 451 in 2021), including homicide (295), road injury (160), and drug overdoses (142).
    • Among Latinos 15-24, there were 3912 deaths in 2020 and 2021 (1967 in 2020 and 1945 in 2021), including homicide (639), road injury (894), and drug overdoses (891).
  • Of the 225 deaths among 35-44 year old AI/AN groups in 2020 and 2021 (106 in 2020 and 119 in 2021), the greatest contributing causes were drug overdoses (45), and road injury (17).

  • Cause-specific data by race/ethnicity and age are available in Appendix Table 3.


Figure 5 - Percent Increase in Number of Deaths 2019 to 2020/2021 by Age Group and Race/Ethnicity and Proportion of Increase due to COVID-19

Complex multi-panel horizontal stacked bar chart; shows percent increase in number of deaths by age group, with stacked bars representing deaths from COVID-19 versus all other causes, and panels for each race/ethnic group. This chart highlights important differences in increases in deaths by age, and by race, and that the cause of increases (COVID-19 versus other causes) differs by age.

Note: The “cause index” is, rather than a direct proportion, the ratio of the number of COVID-19 deaths in 2020 and 2021 to the total increase in deaths from 2019 to 2020 and 2021, and is truncated at 1.0. See the Methods section for details.
*For younger NH/PI and AI/AN age groups, the underlying number of deaths for 2019 and 2020 or 2021 is <25 so data are not shown
**25-34 year old AI/AN experienced an overall decrease in deaths, and had a small number of deaths from COVID-19

Download Figure 5 Data



Data, Methods, and Technical Notes

Discussion



Additional Exploratory Analyses (Note: the section does not include any data or updates from 2021)

Social Determinants of Health

  • Excess mortality was associated with Social Determinants of Health, including Poverty, House Overcrowding, and Limited English Proficiency, in preliminary/exploratory analyses
  • SDOH are based on the community level (census tract) not individual level, using the Krieger/Harvard Public Health Disparities Geocoding approach
  • Both SDOH and race/ethnicity are independently associated with excess mortality. The patterns of SDOH and excess mortality different across r/e groups. These interrelationships are complex, difficulty to measure, and important.

Figure 7 - Increase in Death Rate by Race/Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health in 2020



Different calculation methods can yield different insights into the magnitude and disparities of excess mortality

  • In the information above, excess mortality is calculated as the percent increase in a rate from 2019 to 2020. Other methods can be used, including a method that calculates excess mortality as the increase in the number of death divided by the population size – this method has been used in a published letter assessing excess mortality in California.

  • Part A in the chart below replicates Figure 2 above, and indicates that Latinos have the highest excess mortality based on percent increase. Part B below uses the other method and indicates that Blacks have the highest excess mortality based on the “excess mortality rate”; and indicates that both American Indian/Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders have a higher excess mortality rate than Latinos.

  • The “conclusions” from the two methods differ because of the different ways the methods take into account the rate in the baseline period and the population size. Both of these methods are reasonable and provide different insights.

Figure 8 - Excess Mortality Measures Comparison



Disaggregation of race and ethnicity into more detailed groups provides further insight


  • This preliminary analysis looks at excess mortality using disaggregation of broad race and ethnicity into detailed groups. This type of work is important since detailed race and ethnicity “sub-groups” are likely to be heterogeneous with respect to many characteristics, including health outcomes, health care access and health-related behaviors, and upstream social determinants of health. Analysis based on these more specific “sub-groups” can inform different strategies in terms of public health programs and interventions.


  • Key observations in this chart:
    • There is substantial heterogeneity in excess mortality within in the broad Latino, Asian, and Pacific Islander groups. For example,
      • Among Latinos the “Other Hispanic” group appears to have the highest excess mortality, whereas Puerto Ricans and Cubans appear to have the lowest excess mortality.
        • Note that for deaths the “Other Hispanic” group cannot be disaggregated. But among the population data, 62% of this group is Central American—this strongly suggests that a majority of deaths in this group are also Central Americans, and that Central Americans have very high excess mortality.
      • Among Asians, Cambodians appear to have high excess mortality whereas Thais appear to have low excess mortality.
    • There appears to be notably high excess mortality among the “Other Hispanics” and Guamanian sub-groups.
      • The excess mortality being high in these two groups based on both the “Percent Increase” and “Excess Mortality Rate” approaches strengthens the evidence for this observation.


  • This “first look” at these detailed data has a number of limitations:
    • There are differences in collection of race/ethnicity information for deaths (family or MD informant) versus population data (self-report via survey), which likely contribute to some numerator/denominator misalignment.
    • There are some differences in race/ethnicity groupings and codes between death and population data. Some minor assumptions were required about mapping to a common list for purposes of this analysis.
    • The population data (2015-2019, American Community Survey) are not quite as current as the death data (2019 and 2020).
    • Some of the subgroup numbers are small and may be unstable. Please note that the increase in the number of deaths from 2019 to 2020 for each group is shown inside the bars below.


Figure 9 - Excess Mortality Based on Detailed Race and Ethnicity Groupings (using both “Percent Increase” and “Excess Mortality Rate” Approaches)1

NOTES:

  1. The population denominator data source for these detailed race and ethnicity groupings is the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample (ACS PUMS), 2015-2019 release. Population denominator data used elsewhere in this Brief are from the California Department of Finance (DOF)–the DOF source does not provide detailed race/ethnicity disaggregation.
  2. Based on the population data source the “Other Hispanics” category is 62% Central American. Current California death data includes codes for “Mexican”, “Cuban”, “Puerto Rican”, and “Other Hispanic”. Modifications are underway to the death data system, and more detailed data are expected in 2022.
  3. “Asian Multiple” includes persons of more than one “detailed” Asian race, but not “Asian Unknown”, and no other races, and not Hispanic.
  4. “Multirace” includes persons of more than one race group, but not “Other”, and not Hispanic.
  5. “Pac. Isl. Oth./Mult.” includes persons of another “detailed” Pacific Islander race or of more than one “detailed” Pacific Islander race, and no other races, and not Hispanic.
  6. “Other” person indicating another race without specifying what race.
  7. “Indian Subcontinent” consists of Asian Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and Sri Lankans.
  8. “Asian Other” (which includes persons of an unspecified detailed Asian race, and no other races, and not Hispanic) is not included in the chart above due to concerns of numerator/denominator misalignment.



Figure 10 - Distribution of California Population by Grouped Race/Ethnicity and by Detailed Race/Ethnicity




Conclusion